Hi Gaurab,
seems to say something different. I can see that the current
minimum is
a /22 for annual fees of AU$1584. Am i the only one confused here ?
I was only reading through this yesterday. A /21 is defined as the
minimum practical allocation. I guess the concept of practicality
can change over time which is why the policies are up for debate as
required. I assume that the "very small" membership category is to
cater for those that received an allocation prior to APNIC's decision
to make a /21 the minimum allocation.
It could be argued that a /22 or /23 could be a more practical
allocation in the current resource environment. Such an allocation
would avoid course route filtration, provide for traffic engineering,
and allow a financially restricted SP to be classified as a "very
small" member which aligns well with my understanding of the intent
of prop-053.
Thanks
David
...