Hi Aftab,
Thanks for your comment. Sorry for the late reply.
As agreed by the community, prop-138: Restricting AS-ID in ROA was implemented as a
guideline, not a policy. As with other active guidelines, this guideline is intended to be a
reference (BCP) for prefix holders to manage route, route6 and ROAs in the APNIC Whois
database.
Regards,
Sunny
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2021 10:32 PM
To: Srinivas Chendi <sunny@apnic.net>
Cc: mailman_SIG-policy <sig-policy@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC EC endorses policy proposals from APNIC 52
prop-138: Restricting AS-ID in ROA, that reached consensus at APNIC 52
to be a guideline will also be implemented along with these four
proposals.
As per this
link here [1], APNIC secretariat updated the guidelines on 6th December. The text mentioned there does not comply with what is suggested in the prop-138. I can still create ROAs and route/route6 objects using the ROA interface.
