Skeeve,> I don't agree at all. There may be many who might have an opinion on this policy but do not follow RIR policy proposals. I brought it here because it has an effect on the APNIC region and people may provide a local context and opinion which I or others may take back to the RIPE list.If so, can you express this intension when you originally posted, instead of just copying the URL?I think many people misunderstood that you are proposing same policy in APNIC also.Rgs,Masato YamanishiAPNIC Policy SIG Co-ChairOn 14/06/05 14:43, "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve@v4now.com> wrote:* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policyOn Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
Hi John,
Op 5 jun. 2014, om 16:54 heeft John Curran <jcurran@arin.net> het volgende geschreven:
> On Jun 5, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve@eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is the policy text being proposed in RIPE for Inter-RIR Transfers - 2014-05
>>
>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-05
I think this policy should be discussed on the RIPE address policy mailing list. Feedback in other places does not have much effect ;) CC'ing APWG now.Sander,
I don't agree at all. There may be many who might have an opinion on this policy but do not follow RIR policy proposals. I brought it here because it has an effect on the APNIC region and people may provide a local context and opinion which I or others may take back to the RIPE list.Any discussion is good, no matter where it takes place.
...SkeeveSkeeve Stevens - Senior IP Brokerv4Now - an eintellego Networks serviceskeeve@v4now.com ; www.v4now.comPhone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
