If a line such as "Once an existing LIR has applied and been allocated their
/min from within the last /8, they are not eligible for any further IPv4
allocations from APNIC, regardless of how much unallocated IPv4 space may remain
from the last /8" was included in the proposal, I think it would make it clearer.
could be. i think simplicity was a goal, and not to list all possibly
exclusions as they are quite large. it does say
It is proposed that each existing LIR may request and receive only a
single allocation from the remaining /8 worth of address space:
- Each existing LIR may receive APNIC's current minimum allocation
size in force at time of allocation. If APNIC's current minimum
allocation were to reduce in size in future, the allocation made
under this policy should also be reduced to match.
- Each existing LIR may receive the specified allocation size
regardless of size or intended membership tier
- Each existing LIR may apply for and receive this allocation once
they meet the criteria to receive IPv4 address space according
to APNIC's current allocation policy in force at the time
(currently documented in [APNIC-86]).
By the time we get to the last /8 it's all too late anyway.
i suspect it's pretty late now.
randy
