Hi Owen,
 
> That concept has been floated multiple times and is as ill-conceived now as ever.
> Owen
 
 
Times are changing. What was once conceived of as an orderly transition from IPv4 to IPv6 has bogged down and the current situation is one where APNIC has run out of available IPv4 addresses while the Internet is still 99.7% IPv4 traffic.
 
Asian operators have little choice now but to enter the IPv4 transfer market.
Since there is no existing policy mechanism for the transfer of ARIN addresses to APNIC, Asian operators will logically look for an alternate source.
Legacy addresses which are not under any agreement with any RIR can be legally bought and sold.
And there is no restriction on these addresses being routed from any region on the planet.
 
If the RIRs fail to adopt policies which will facilitate interregional transfers, and there is no law precluding these transactions of legacy space, then these transactions will occur.
 
The author of the article I sent points out that the current situation drives the need for a private registry for legacy addresses.
 
If a private registry is anathema to you, please consider pushing policies in the ARIN region which would facilitate global transfers and reduce the need for a private registry.
Because if the RIRs refuse to recognize rational business transactions, these transactions will be driven either to a private registry, or worse, driven "off the books" entirely.
 
Regards,
 
Mike Burns
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Owen DeLong
To: Mike Burns
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Article of possible interest to the community

That concept has been floated multiple times and is as ill-conceived now as ever.

Owen

On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Mike Burns wrote:

Hi Owen,
 
I came across a response to Mr. Vixie's article and thought it might be of interest to the APNIC community, particularly as it mentions pending IPv4 legacy address sales to Asian customers.
 
 
The concept elucidated is a private registry for legacy addresses which would have no restrictions on interregional sales, thus allowing the legal transfer of legacy IPv4 address into Asia.
 
Regards,
 
Mike Burns
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:31 AM
Subject: [sig-policy] Article of possible interest to the community

I came across this ACM article and thought it might be of interest to the APNIC
community as well...


Owen




*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy