Hello Shin,
On 29/01/2008, at 7:41 PM, Shin SHIRAHATA wrote:
I think these conditions are not clear that transfer part of address
block is allowed.
For example, an entity that have /16 can transfer /17 to another
entity
or entity should transfer whole of /16.
The proposal speaks of the transfer of address blocks. It makes no
mention of allocations. Isn't it reasonably clear that a block being
transfered can be a subnet of an allocation that has been made to the
transferring entity? There is no wording in the proposal restricting
transfers to address blocks aligned with complete APNC allocations.
Thanks
David
...