will close in a week from today.
Past discussions can be followed by refering to "sig-nir" and
"sig-policy" mailing list archives since September this year.
If there is anyone who would like to express their opinion about this
proposal, please voice your opinion on the "sig-nir" mailing list by
16th Nov. Thanks.
Hi Thu Thuy and Nhung,
Thank you for expressing your position for this proposal.
The situation at the moment is that there is a split in opinions between
NIRs/NIR members and some of the other APNIC members.
I acknowledge NIRs/NIR members' needs, but I really don't think we can
move on unless the other APNIC members are more comfortable with it.
Judging from the comments received so far, the concern here is that
abolishing(actually, "waiver" is a more accurate word) should take place
with more concrete planning and should make sense business-wise.
Suggestions from these members had been:
- Present more concrete plan for the long term fee revision at the same
time
- come up with a plan which absorbs the 1% impact on APNIC's
budget(zero impact on APNIC budget)
I recommend NIRs to address this area in your proposal so that it would
be more agreeable to other APNIC members.
Izumi
Phan Thi Nhung wrote:
Dear all,
VNNIC support this proposal. Actually, to promote our member to deploy IPV6, VNNIC do not charge IPV6 per address fee. In our opinion, what LIRs does't have to pay if they are APNIC member they will not have to pay when becoming VNNIC member.
Nhung.
----- Original Message -----
From: Thu Thuy
To: sig-policy@apnic.net
Cc: Izumi Okutani ; wei chenguang
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re:[sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfee forNIRs"
Hi, all
I personnally support this proposal because it takes a role in promotion ipv6 utilisation in the early period of the new Internet Protocol.
Thu Thuy.
----- Original Message -----
From: wei chenguang
To: Izumi Okutani ; sig-policy@apnic.net
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re:[sig-policy] Final call forcomments:[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfee for NIRs"
I support the proposal. I think it's fair for all people who want to apply IP address.
======== 2005-10-07 16:54:42 ========
The mailing list is very quiet now, but I'm interesed to hear opinions
again on how people feel about this proposal after some discussions.
a) against the proposal
b) support the proposal
c) doesn't mind either way
d) other opinion
If possible, it would also help if you could also explain the reason for
your position. Thanks!
Izumi
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
