Thanks Sanjay for your information.

Actually at present criteria for transfers (1 year ) is fine for  criteria prior to last /8 stage.

Since a new APNIC member (LIR) get allocation based on  1 year demonstrate  prior to last /8 stage so if a existing LIR get allocation based on 24 month demonstrate then that would not be fair for new APNIC member (LIR) also it's quit difficult to justify the  2 year period in case of transfers.






Thanks
---------- Md. Jahangir Hossain
          
Bangladesh
          





On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Sanjaya <sanjaya@apnic.net> wrote:
Aftab and all,

We currently apply the same criteria (1 year need) for transfers,
exactly the same as the criteria prior to last /8 stage.

Changing the evaluation based on 2 year need will result in larger
approval size.

For example:

- Assuming that the requestor can demonstrate, with good evidence, a
need for a /17 in one year and a /16 in two year
- With the current criteria we will approve a /17 transfer.
- With the prop-104 criteria we will approve a /16 transfer.

Hope this helps in the discussion.

Regards,
Sanjaya

On 5/09/2012 4:54 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Question to Hostmaster/Sec,
>
> Would like to know how a /16 with demonstrated need of 12months was
> approved prior to last /8 policy (prop-062)? If that was not an issue
> for the LIRs to get /16 with a promise to be used in an year than how
> come it is so much difficult to justify the same now and extend that
> period in case of transfers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Andy Linton <asjl@lpnz.org
> <mailto:asjl@lpnz.org>> wrote:
>
>     Dear SIG members
>
>     prop-104: Clarifying demonstrated needs requirement in IPv4 transfer
>     policy, reached consensus at the APNIC 34 Policy SIG and later at the
>     APNIC Member Meeting.
>
>     This proposal will now move to the next step in the APNIC Policy
>     Development Process and is being returned to the Policy SIG mailing list
>     for the final 8-week comment period.
>
>     At the end of this period the Policy SIG Chairs will evaluate comments
>     made and determine if the consensus reached at APNIC 34 still holds.
>
>     If consensus holds, the Chairs of the Policy SIG will ask the Executive
>     Council to endorse the proposal for implementation.
>
>         - Send all comments and questions to: <sig-policy@apnic.net
>     <mailto:sig-policy@apnic.net>>
>         - Deadline for comments:                       Wednesday, 31
>     October 2012
>
>
>
>     Proposal details
>     ---------------------
>
>     This proposal increases to 24 months, the demonstrated need evaluation
>     period for IPv4 transfer recipients.
>
>     Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and
>     links to the APNIC 34 meeting archive, are available at:
>
>     http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-104
>
>     Regards
>
>     Andy, Skeeve, and Masato
>     *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>                *
>     _______________________________________________
>     sig-policy mailing list
>     sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
>     http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
>
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>

--
________________________________________________________________________
Sanjaya                                     email:     sanjaya@apnic.net
Services and Operations Director, APNIC     sip:  sanjaya@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net                        phone:       +61 7 3858 3100
________________________________________________________________________
  * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy



--