Hi all,
Regarding this policy proposal (https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-124).
I will like to understand if everybody got the issue.
This problem is basically the same in all the 5 RIRs and I proposed the same text to all (in some cases got simplified).
The problem is only for end-users (in IPv4 doesn't happen because we use NAT) which aren't allowed to provide addresses (for the connection to Internet) to third parties, in a few examples:
1) You're a university and you provide addresses to students
2) You're a company and provide addresses for the employees
3) You're a small hot-spot provider and of course, you want to have customers on it
So, the proposal allows to use addresses (up to /64) for temporary users, and not consider them as sub-assignments.
Opinions?
Questions?
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
