Perhaps, we don't need to specify the size and state that
assignments to router interface can be considered as
infrastructure?
sounds reasonable
Or are you suggesting that any size shorter than /126 should
be registered indivisually?
i doubt the community will become conservative enough to
legislate conservative practices until ipv6 is more seriously
deployed and we can see that 64 bits of address space is not
the same as infinity. after all, it took us a decade to
realize that with ipv4.
randy
