If so, I don't stick to continueing discussion.
-----Original Message-----
From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Philip Smith
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:18 PM
To: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29
policy proposals
If the cases of misuse of the existing policy are increasing, then I'd
prefer to see this proposal pass.
I agree that someone should introduce a new policy proposal (which I'm
happy to help author) which would deal with the intent of the original
policy without potential for misuse.
philip
Paul Wilson said the following on 7/05/10 12:25 :
Yi Chu, Masato san and all,
APNIC staff have reported that this policy may have been
used in certain
cases to "amplify" address holdings, for instance by
exchanging 5 /24s for
a /21 (representing 8 /24s), and then repeating that
process over time.
While such transactions are allowed by the policy, they may
be interpreted
as cases of "misuse" of the policy.
As these cases appear to be increasing, and may increase
more due to
awareness generated by this discussion, I would request
that we allow the
proposal to pass, and then consider reintroducing the
policy in future with
amendments which could prevent or reduce cases of (apparent) abuse.
Best regards,
Paul Wilson.
--On 7 May 2010 10:34:28 AM +0900 myamanis@bb.softbank.co.jp wrote:
Dear all,
IMHO, Yi and RandyW's comments are not objections actually,
rather good inputs for further improvement of this proposal.
(Sorry for using another terminology > Chairs)
So, why not return to ML for further discussion unless authors have
urgent issue?
Rgs,
Masato
-----Original Message-----
From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Yi Chu
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:41 AM
To: Randy Bush; Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29
policy proposals
I was the one raised one of the objections. I consider my
objection 'substantial', as the proposal would take away a
good practice for the general good of the Internet.
yi
----- Original Message ----
From: Randy Bush randy@psg.com
To: Policy SIG sig-policy@apnic.net
Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 4:17:06 AM
Subject: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29
policy proposals
prop-080: Removal of IPv4 prefix exchange policy
Dear colleagues
The eight-week final comment period for the proposal
'Removal of IPv4
prefix exchange policy' has ended. During the final days of
the comment
period there were two objections raised to the proposal. The
Chairs are
a bit ambivalent about whether the objections are
'substantial' or not.
According to the APNIC Policy Development Process:
- If the objections are considered 'substantial', it
means that the
proposal cannot be deemed to have reached consensus
in the final
comment period.
- If the objections are not considered 'substantial', it
means that
the proposal can be deemed to have reached consensus.
The Chairs therefore ask the community to help us decide
whether to
consider the two objections received as 'substantial'. We
welcome your
input on this to the mailing list by the end of Wednesday, 12 May
2010. The question we are asking is:
- Do you think the objections made to prop-080 are
substantial?
Yes/No
For a detailed history of this proposal see:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-080
Regards
APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
Randy, Ching-Heng, and Terence
policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC
dg@apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7
3858 3100/99
management policy *
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy