Randy,

>> I would like to propose aligning Chair' term with Co-Chair's term,
>> which means that Chair and all Co-Chair will serve for same two years.

>could make for a tough transition if both are replaced at the same time.

I know that original intension of staggered term is mitigating such transition difficulties,

but now we have another practice in SIG guideline as follows.

>Unless new Policy SIG Chairs and Co-Chairs are required immediately, there will be a handover period. Outgoing Chairs and Co-Chairs are expected to follow >proposals reaching consensus at the current OPM, to the completion of the Policy Development Process.

In addition, other SIGs, NIR and Co-Operation SIG, are having Chair and Co-Chair elections simultaneously at least past 4-5 years (maybe more).

Since SIG guideline is applied to these SIGs as well, a gap exist in there and I would like to fix it.

Regards,

Matt

2016-09-05 19:52 GMT+09:00 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>:

[ this is address policy? ]

> Secondary, it can be used by fraud, like hijacking the position of
> Chair agaist the Community by inviting many persons who never attend
> the community discussion.
> ...
> I would like to propose limiting eligible voters of SIG Chair election
> to registered participants of APNIC Conference where the election is
> held.
>
> In this context, registered participants include remote participants
> who register to Confer, or its successor in future.

is there an unstated assumption that many persons could attend the
meeting who are not registered locally or remotely? does that
assumption hold?

> I would like to propose aligning Chair' term with Co-Chair's term,
> which means that Chair and all Co-Chair will serve for same two years.

could make for a tough transition if both are replaced at the same time.

randy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy