If we have a look at the synopsis and the introduction of prop-99. We can see that it is concerned with allowing members to receive allocations from a single contiguous space. I would say that that would satisfy the contiguous requirement of the prop-100 proposer.

Synopsis	This proposal extends the IPv6 request process to allow large ISPs to request multiple prefixes within a single, contiguous, reserved space.

Or the introduction

This proposal extends the IPv6 request process to allow large ISPs to
request multiple prefixes within a single, contiguous, reserved space.

Such a request must justify each prefix allocation in terms of specific
demonstrated needs (in the same manner as a normal IPv6 allocation
request); and must justify the total requested reservation in terms of
documented architectural plans and projected space requirements for a
period of up to 10 years.

Regards,

Dean

Apologies for brevity. Message sent from mobile device

On 30/08/2011, at 3:25 PM, Naresh Ajwani <ajwaninaresh@gmail.com> wrote:

dear Dean,

I agree with this point. I believe that with little to no changes, prop-98 and/or prop-99 will provide most of the benefit that the proposer of prop-100 is seeking.

Kindly explain which part of prop-98/99 is addressing the contgious or other benefits being sought by the proposer.

Regards and best wishes,

Naresh Ajwani

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:05, Dean Pemberton <dean@deanpemberton.com> wrote:

(a) Contiguous address block allocation is not ensured by APNIC when
an organization goes back to APNIC for further allocation
(reapplying after more than one year)

I support addressing this potential problem -- e.g. through propositions 98 or 99.

I agree with this point. I believe that with little to no changes, prop-98 and/or prop-99 will provide most of the benefit that the proposer of prop-100 is seeking.

From the feedback on the list so far, I would advise that the proposer take a look at these other proposals and determine if they fulfil his requirements. It may be the case that through small changes, these other proposals (which have received less negative feedback) could satisfy the requirements equally well.

Regards,
Dean

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy