Hi,
On 05/02/2008 15:11, "Jonny Martin" jonny@jonnynet.net wrote:
[...]
I would prefer that that the "plan" to advertise was in fact a
"requirement" to advertise, however I'm happy either way. (And I
hope that the 'plan to advertise' is not misconstrued in the same way
that the 'plan for 200 assignments' in current policy seems to have
been...)
Perhaps "an intent to advertise" would remove any ambiguity?
Regards,
Leo Vegoda
(Not based in APNIC's service region)