Hi,
Just to mention that Izumi mentioned what is also largely requested and done at the AfriNIC region as well. I don't think there is any policy implication for member that peers with a different ASN other than the ones provided during application.
Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 2015/02/27 14:00, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Hi Guangliang,
>
>
>> The option "b" is acceptable.
>>
>> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in
>> immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed
>> at the time of submitting a request
>>
>
> But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with whom
> they may or may not multhome in future. right?
>
I don't know whether it's adequate to do the same case in the APNIC
region but sharing our case as a reference -
JPNIC requests for contact information for those ASNs they plan to be
connected.
We sometimes we contact the upstreams and confirm the plan and this
seems to be working OK.
Regards,
Izumi
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy