Good morning Masato. 

After consideration the co-authors feel that RPKI is an unnecessary addition and reference to it as a requirement will be removed in a subsequent draft. 

It is essential that any barrier to entry or perception of exclusivity or licensing  for the use of this prefix be removed.


Regards
Dean


On Thursday, February 6, 2014, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis@japan-telecom.com> wrote:
Dear SIG members,

Can you go back to original point which is whether the RPKI section is
needed for prop-110 or not?
IMO, it is quite important point to consider this proposal.

Also, please note that APNIC policy SIG is not a place to debate between
regions.

Rgs,
Masato (Matt) Yamanishi




On 14/02/04 16:16, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> I did not intend the normative SHOULD that you are implying, if you
>> prefer s/should/"MAY WISH TO" and see RFC 6919.
>
>actually, i suggest the manner i deal with the arin policy, i do not
>post to the list, period.  [ and, my $dayjob is in the arin region. ]
>
>the world was tired of americans telling everyone else what to do even
>before snowden.
>
>randy
>*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
>_______________________________________________
>sig-policy mailing list
>sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy


*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy


--
--
Dean Pemberton

Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
dean@internetnz.net.nz

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.