Great, how do the NIRs feel about this?
Let's correct a mistake first.
Then let's discuss what to do.
Would you like to work closely on the proposal by setting up a working
group? If yes, we can call for the volunteers publicly from the whole
community.
Izumi
Philip Smith wrote:
Hi Izumi-san,
Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over
this particular
proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the
decision, and I
felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
"no-consensus".
This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
continue discussions on this topic.
I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original
motivation of the
proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact
on APNIC. A
solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
described earlier.
Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd
find that at
all useful.
philip
sig-nir mailing list
sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
