Hi Skeeve,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><div>There are always different views and I&#39;m confused how the problem-statement and discussion period could in any way be enforceable.</div>
</blockquote><div><br>I agree with this statement but we have to find a way to conclude the discussion someway or the other. isn&#39;t it?<br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div></div><div>I also think that experienced policy people probably don&#39;t need this - they know what they are in for and have probably shopped the policy around - especially if they have multiple co-authors.</div><br>
</blockquote></div>Experienced policy authors know very well how to work things around for sure. The usually come up with solid problems and solutions so no worries for them at all.<br><br><br clear="all">Regards,<br><br>
Aftab A. Siddiqui<br>
<br>