Tomohiro san and all,

You made my point I believe. The current questionably consensus based policy which you kindly provided the link for, does not definitively what constitutes in any way, "subsequent allocation criteria." Hence leaving LIR's and ISP's as well as other stakeholders/users in a unclear and argumentative and confused position unnecessarily.

(Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/?$BF#:j?(B ?$BCR9(?(B) wrote:

Jeff,

| I am not sure what "subsequent allocation criteria." means or is exactly. | Is there a definitive written description?

This criteria is defined at section 5.2.1 in current IPv6 allocation policy:

http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/ipv6-address-policy.html

Yours sincerely,

Tomohiro Fujisaki

Regards,

-- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827