I also agree with Terry and Ji-Young.
The prop-50 doesn't justify use of transferred space using the allocation
and assignment policies and restrictions, it will conflict with the goals of
address management of Conservation and Fairness (You can see at "5 Goals of
address space management",
<chair hat = off>
as you may remember from policy proposal prop-067, see
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-067-v001.html, i personally
am in agreement.
<chair hat = on>
but, the meeting in manila could not reach consensus on this and on the
other loophole-closing points. though i am not sure all loopholes could
ever be closed. some are probably worth trying.
i suggest that, as it we are told that it would take many months to
implement policy-50 as ammended, that you and others propose individual
single shot policies to address what you see as the critical issues.
does this make sense as a way forward?
randy