On Thursday, September 13, 2012, Terry Manderson wrote:
Speaking for myself.
I think 'fulfills the communities needs' also needs to be in hand with 'responsible to the community' in terms of process, cost, and time.
My observation is that policy concerns surrounding IPv6 are quite different from IPv4 as IPv4 slowly approaches legacy.
Given this why not moot a simple gated process for IPv4 policy changes?
The idea being a IPv4 proposal can be heard once a problem statement and supporting evidence is first presented to the chairs AND if the chairs agree the problem is valid, AND there is sig-policy mailing list consensus if the problem is valid AND there is enough people willing to work (not just comment) on the policy. From there the proposal process (as we know it today) can be initiated.
This, I would think, will stop errant and frivolous IPv4 proposals from hitting the shores. Although I'm still a big fan of 'enough v4 policy already'.
Cheers
Terry
On 13/09/2012, at 7:07 AM, Dean Pemberton wrote:
> Cheers for the comment Gaurab.
> Is it your view that the current PDP fulfils the communities needs?
> If not what changes would you propose?
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> On 9/12/12 1:51 AM, Dean Pemberton wrote:
>>> So it seems that we have two sets of requirements.
>>
>> I thought the only requirement was to reduce process, not make more of
>> it.
>>
>> - -gaurab
>>
>> - --
>>
>> http://www.gaurab.org.np/
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlBQbO8ACgkQSo7fU26F3X2cmgCg6PYV+b1pvidv7kc+rwJYdh8v
>> v8wAnA8s93ye/RaIyOsrTmr96qrhzRhV
>> =F4wX
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dean
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy