I am going to crawl back in my box for a bit. In my email I read 'APNIC EC endorses prop-050' as it was right next to the prop-069 one. I really to wear my glasses more often.
Thank you all for doing exactly what you were supposed to... umm
Embarrassed... going to put my head in the ground :(
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?
-----Original Message-----
From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-
bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Sunday, 31 May 2009 11:08 PM
To: sig-policy@apnic.net
Cc: Sam Dickinson
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC EC returns prop-050: IPv4 address
transfers to Policy SIG
All,
I am personally disgusted that even when two of the three co-chairs did
not think that consensus had been reached, Randy rammed his position
through.
I think an investigation needs to be seriously looked into how this has
happened, and that indeed if there is any point to the comment period
as no matter how much was said, Randy got what he wanted.
I presume the EC reads this list, and if they do, I am very
disappointed in them for allowing this to go through when there are
clear concerns about it.
I would like to know the process to make a formal complaint please...
Sam, please advise.
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?
-----Original Message-----
From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-
bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Sam Dickinson
Sent: Friday, 22 May 2009 3:40 PM
To: sig-policy@apnic.net
Subject: [sig-policy] APNIC EC returns prop-050: IPv4 address
transfers
to Policy SIG
--
APNIC EC returns "IPv4 address transfers" to Policy SIG
--
Dear colleagues
The APNIC EC (Executive Council), at its meeting on 21 May 2009,
returned prop-050, "IPv4 address transfers", to the Policy SIG for
further discussion. Minutes from this meeting will be available
after
they have been adopted at the June 2009 EC meeting.
Below is the official notification from the EC:
This is a response to the Policy Development Manager from the
APNIC Executive Council.
The APNIC Policy SIG Chair formally requested the APNIC EC to
endorse Proposal-50 on the 20th May.
According to the APNIC Policy Development Process: "The EC, in
their capacity as representatives of the membership, will be
asked
to endorse the consensus proposals arising from the OPM and the
SIG mailing lists for implementation at the next EC meeting. In
reviewing the proposals for implementation, the EC may refer
proposals back to the SIG for further discussion with clearly
stated reasons."
In its meeting of the 21st May the APNIC Executive Council has
decided to refer Proposal-50 back to the Policy SIG. The reason
for this referral is that the EC is not of the opinion that the
proposal has gathered a clear consensus in favour of the policy,
and the EC notes that the proposal, taken in isolation, has
engendered significant concerns within the community relating to
the adequacy of safeguards against potential abuse as a
consequence of implementation this policy.
regards,
Geoff Huston
Executive Secretary to the APNIC EC
for the APNIC EC
For a detailed history of the proposal, see:
http://www.apnic.net/services/services-apnic-provides/policy/policy-
proposals/prop-050
Regards
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Samantha Dickinson email: sam@apnic.net
Policy Development Manager, APNIC sip: sam@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
