Question for the staff on this. Is the AS0 proposal not sufficient to comply with Aftab observation, or it is just something in the backlog of pending secretariat activities, or what is the reason for that?

 

 

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 30/8/22, 3:48, "Aftab Siddiqui" <aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com> escribió:

 

Hi Vivek,

 

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 18:15, Vivek Nigam <vivek@apnic.net> wrote:

Hi Aftab,

 

APNIC creates RPKI ROAs with origin AS0 for all undelegated address space (marked as “Available” and “Reserved” in the delegated-apnic-extended-latest stats file. It may be worth noting that APNIC publishes these AS0 ROAs in a different Trust Anchor (AS0 TAL) and recommends its Members use APNIC AS0 TAL as a routing information service only.

 

https://www.apnic.net/community/security/resource-certification/apnic-limitations-of-liability-for-rpki-2/

 

 

That is incorrect, there are more than 160 IPv4 prefixes (I haven't checked v6 yet) which are marked as either "reserved" or "available" in the APNIC delegation file and they don't exist in AS-0 ROA. So there must be some policy which is in place. 

 

delegate file: 2.3|apnic|20220830|158240||20220829|+1000

AS0 ROA: SigningTime:    2022-08-30T01:10:15Z


Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

 

 


**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.