Hi Matthew and all,
The APNIC Secretariat has not turned down any IPv6 request from India
(or from any other economies for that matter). I believe the policy is
about forward planning, more than anything else.
Cheers,
________________________________________________________________________
Sanjaya email: sanjaya@apnic.net
Services Director, APNIC sip: sanjaya@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
________________________________________________________________________
* Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
On 29/08/2011 1:49 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
On 29/08/2011, at 12:26 PM, Andy Linton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Alastair Johnsonaj@sneep.net wrote:
Hello Naresh,
Could we please have more information on this project? Hopefully that will allow all to understand the requirement for prop-100 better.
I've had extensive discussions in Busan this week with the author of
prop-100 and other APNIC members from India about the large push by
the Indian government who have mandated that all ISPs with more that
10000 customers must have an IPv6 service offering in place by the end
of this year.
I'd call that a reasonably large project and if I was involved in this
I'd want to make sure my addressing policy was in place in advance
I'm still unclear as to why the space can't be obtained? Has APNIC not given space out to these ISPs? Have any of them approached APNIC and been turned down?
MMC
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy