You bring up a very important concern above. It is certainly not the
intent of this proposal to create an unreasonable burden on APNIC. It
is difficult however for the membership as a whole to ascertain this
burden is in fact unreasonable without being authorised to view any
information around the costs associated with its implementation.
ripe ncc did this analysis and is providing a path for PI and legacy
holders to use certification services.
If this cost is $100 per record then as you say, this could open APNIC
up to a cost of $4,600,000.
this is based on the hypothesis that every asn in internet is gonna use
1.2.3.0/24? while i agree that the level of stupidity on the internet
is disturbingly high, even i doubt it is that high.
fwiw, i appose prop-110 for the leakage issues. and there will be
leakage issues.
randy