> <mailto:
jonny@jonnynet.net>> wrote:
>
> On 26/01/2008, at 2:37 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > The proposal 'Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation
> criteria' has
> > been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented during
> > the
> > Policy SIG sessions at APNIC 25 in Taipei, Taiwan, 25-29 February
> > 2008.
> >
> > The proposal's history can be found at:
> >
> >
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-057-v001.html
> >
>
> Now I wholeheartedly support the deployment of v6, however currently
> I fail to see the actual requirement for this proposal. Current
> wording is purely for a *plan* for 200 v6 customers. I have plans
> for a lot of things. Reality is often quite different to those plans.
>
> I don't see this proposal directly promoting the *deployment* of v6.
> If members feel that the biggest obstacle in the way to deploying -
> in any capacity - v6 was justifying an initial allocation, then how
> are they going to get on when it comes to actually implementing it.
>
> Are there any members out there who have not been able to obtain v6
> space under the current policy? If there is demonstrably a real
> problem here then I am happy to change my view on this policy.
> Otherwise I'm going to expend my efforts on actual problems.
>
> Cheers,
> Jonny.
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
> policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list