On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:21 , Masato Yamanishi <myamanis@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Colleagues,Regarding prop-113, I saw 3 very simple support and 1 clarification without any negative comment.Isn't there any concern or negative comment?Dean>Can you express your view after clarification?Aflab and Skeeve>If prop-113 will reach consensus but prop-114 will not, is it acceptable initial approach to implement only prop-113?Or, these are inseparable policies?Regards,Masato Yamanishi, Policy SIG Chair (Acting)* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *2015-02-03 22:18 GMT-06:00 Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev@dcs1.biz>:On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis@gmail.com> wrote:
The proposal "prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.Support.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy