Dear all,
The policy proposal was referred to the next APNIC meeting due to lack of support from the community, the show of hands in support and opposition in the room was in the low count.
I would like to ask any remote participant on the list interested about this proposal who have not yet to come forward to please do so and show your support or opposition.
Confer software was showing a large disproportionate support compared to the support in the room.
During the session it was mention that people were "gaming the conf software", which is not acceptable.
I therefore ask for 2 things from APNIC secretariat
1.
APNIC secretariat please release any supporting information about the suspicion of system gaming, this is a very severe accusation against the APNIC community at large, denouncing whoever was behind that should be done.
2.
Did other proposal get affected in the same manner?