I don't think I've heard such a nonsense suggestion for a long time.

Address space transfers are one thing. But vanity ip addressing? Come on.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:00 AM, David Huberman <David.Huberman@microsoft.com> wrote:

Hello Policy SIG,

 

I have an idea for 1.2.3.0/24 I would like to share with you before submitting a policy proposal.

 

Prop-109 properly directed APNIC to use 1.0.0.0/24 and 1.1.1.0/24 for research purposes.  That leaves one more significant prefix to deal with: 1.2.3.0/24.  It is significant because it contains the IP address 1.2.3.4.

 

1.2.3.4 is a desirable IP address.  It can be used in all sorts of very interesting applications.  It also receives an enormous amount of “junk” traffic every day, so it requires a fairly hefty infrastructure just to start routing it. 


My idea is that APNIC should make this prefix available to all parties who want it. To decide who gets it, I propose an AUCTION where all proceeds go to a charitable endeavor (perhaps a future APNIC Foundation).   As the potential author of such a proposal, and as the IP address manager at Microsoft Corporation, I will guarantee that neither I nor my company will participate in any way in such an auction.  This proposal is not to benefit me or my company.  It is to give the prefix out to a network operator who wants it, in return for money given to charity.

 

This is a new idea, and is not fully thought out.  So I wanted to post it, get some reactions, and improve the idea.  (Or abandon it if people do not like it.)

 

Thank you.

 

David

 

David R Huberman
Principal, Global IP Addressing

Microsoft Corporation

 


*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy




--

LL

- Si vis pacem para bellum