Okay, there is no end to this discussions.
This is wrong again.
Your subjective view is involved here again.
Some of the members still want to discuss.
You should not intervene the discussion.
(Open, transparent... you know the stuff)
Let's confirm with the EC whether it was the wrong decision as I
mentioned on the mailing list yesterday.
Dear EC members on the list,
Would you please review the decision and the process and
provide us with
your position on whether the consensus decision was unrighteously
declared as some members on this mailing list believe?
This part is wrong again.
If you look at the policy development process at
http://apnic.net/docs/policy/dev/process.html,
this discussion can not go to EC at this point.
What do you expect from EC.
Are they gods?, judges?
You have to provide more information than above when
the discussion is over among members
Regards,
Chanki
Regards,
Izumi Okutani
NIR SIG Chair
Stephan Millet wrote:
Good...
However, we have to fix the mistake first.
And the mistake being what ??? We don't agree with the
KRNIC position ?
Stephan Millet
management policy *
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy