Hi Izumi-san,
Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over this particular
proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the decision, and I
felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
"no-consensus".
This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
continue discussions on this topic.
I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original motivation of the
proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact on APNIC. A
solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
described earlier.
Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd find that at
all useful.
philip
--