Hi Rahul

As I suspected, it looks like they are filtering/dropping my prefix, presumably as it was previously unallocated/bogon.

tracepath -p 4500 49.44.59.38
 1?: [LOCALHOST]                      pmtu 1500
 1:  103.176.189.33                                        1.357ms
 1:  103.176.189.33                                        0.641ms
 2:  36.255.84.36                                          3.455ms
 3:  103.16.68.10                                          2.025ms
 4:  no reply
 5:  115.112.9.29.STATIC-Bangalore.vsnl.net.in             2.351ms asymm  3
 6:  no reply
 7:  115.112.8.118.STATIC-Chennai.vsnl.net.in              9.784ms asymm  8
 8:  no reply
 9:  no reply
10:  no reply
11:  no reply
12:  no reply
13:  no reply
14:  no reply
15:  no reply
16:  no reply
17:  no reply
18:  no reply
19:  no reply
20:  no reply
21:  no reply
22:  no reply
23:  no reply
24:  no reply
25:  no reply
26:  no reply
27:  no reply
28:  no reply
29:  no reply
30:  no reply
     Too many hops: pmtu 1500
     Resume: pmtu 1500


--
Best Regards
Daryll J. L. Swer
Mobile Number: +91 700 592 0360


On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 21:37, Rahul Makhija <rahul.m@estointernet.in> wrote:
Hi Daryll

If the protocol in use is UDP, on a linux machine you could use tracepath which allows you to specify dest port as well. Following is the output on my ubuntu machine.

rahul@server:~$ tracepath -p 4500 49.44.59.38
 1?: [LOCALHOST]                      pmtu 1500
 1:  ???                                                   0.821ms
 1:  no reply
 2:  ???                                                   1.307ms
 3:  no reply
 4:  no reply
 5:  no reply
 6:  no reply
 7:  no reply
 8:  no reply
 9:  no reply
10:  no reply
11:  no reply
12:  no reply
13:  no reply
14:  no reply
15:  no reply
16:  no reply
17:  no reply
18:  no reply
19:  no reply
20:  no reply
21:  no reply
22:  49.44.59.38                                          37.638ms reached
     Resume: pmtu 1500 hops 22 back 7

Can you try the same & check if you're able to reach UDP:4500 on the same destination?

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:06 PM Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com> wrote:
Hi Rahul

I determined the following is used:
49.44.59.38 over UDP port 4500.

It looks like AS55836 only accepts UDP connections to those IP addresses and hence TCP pings fails. Any further suggestions?

PS C:\Users\daryl\Desktop\PSTools> ./tcping64.exe -p 4500 49.44.59.38

Probing 49.44.59.38:4500/tcp - No response - time=2010.300ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:4500/tcp - No response - time=2014.373ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:4500/tcp - No response - time=2014.485ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:4500/tcp - No response - time=2014.512ms

Ping statistics for 49.44.59.38:4500
     4 probes sent.
     0 successful, 4 failed.  (100.00% fail)
Was unable to connect, cannot provide trip statistics.
PS C:\Users\daryl\Desktop\PSTools> ./tcping64.exe -p 443 49.44.59.38

Probing 49.44.59.38:443/tcp - No response - time=2013.617ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:443/tcp - No response - time=2001.272ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:443/tcp - No response - time=2015.632ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:443/tcp - No response - time=2002.627ms

Ping statistics for 49.44.59.38:443
     4 probes sent.
     0 successful, 4 failed.  (100.00% fail)
Was unable to connect, cannot provide trip statistics.
PS C:\Users\daryl\Desktop\PSTools> ./tcping64.exe -p 80 49.44.59.38

Probing 49.44.59.38:80/tcp - No response - time=2012.398ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:80/tcp - No response - time=2014.021ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:80/tcp - No response - time=2014.230ms
Probing 49.44.59.38:80/tcp - No response - time=2008.071ms

Ping statistics for 49.44.59.38:80
     4 probes sent.
     0 successful, 4 failed.  (100.00% fail)
Was unable to connect, cannot provide trip statistics.


--
Best Regards
Daryll J. L. Swer
Mobile Number: +91 700 592 0360


On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 16:08, Rahul Makhija <rahul.m@estointernet.in> wrote:
Have you tried wireshark? You could inspect each & every packet leaving your network/devices ( and port numbers thereof ).



On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 4:00 PM Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com> wrote:
Hi Rahul

I agree with you and TCP Traceroute/Ping was the first thing on my mind, but unfortunately, I'm unable to determine the port number.

--
Best Regards
Daryll J. L. Swer
Mobile Number: +91 700 592 0360
Website: daryllswer.com


On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:57, Rahul Makhija <rahul.m@estointernet.in> wrote:
Hi Daryll,

Ping is never the ideal tool to conclude if you're able to reach any given destination. Especially ICMP, this is quite common practice to block ICMP responses. I too am not able to "ping" the same host from AS135817 but Jio VoWIFI works just fine for me.

Maybe you want to do a tcp traceroute on the intended port number ( I'm not sure which port number is being used here for VoWiFi ). You'll surely find more useful information.

Thank you.
Rahul

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:39 PM Daryll Swer via INNOG <innog@innog.net> wrote:
Hi Folks

Does anybody know who I can reach out to for the following issue?

My freshly allocated prefix (103.176.189.0/24) is unable to communicate with Reliance Jio's VoWiFi end-point on AS55836. And hence my Jio numbers are unable to work with VoWiFi when the source IPv4 address is originating from 103.176.189.0/24.
image.png

--
Best Regards
Daryll J. L. Swer
Mobile Number: +91 700 592 0360
_______________________________________________
INNOG mailing list -- innog@innog.net
To unsubscribe send an email to innog-leave@innog.net