Dear Team,
Mr George Michaelson , in his blog , https://blog.apnic.net/2021/12/17/the-space-between-ipv6-allocations-part-2/ , mentioned that APNIC has changed the block based allocation method to delegations for NIRs (when and why was not mentioned in the blog).
As per my understanding, it’s like APNIC used to allocate big IPV6 block to NIR (for further allocation to its members) which has now been changed to direct delegations to members instead of NIR.
A big block to NIR can help in super netting the v6 announcement at NIR (or at country level) , which can help in reducing the routing table size in long terms AND can also have IPv6 allocations in consecutive order for the economies where we have NIRs.
APNIC still allots ASN block to NIRs for further allocation to NIR members.
So my question is what leads to change in IPv6 allocation method for NIRs ??
This is posted in INNOG , SANOG , APNIC-TALK mailing and a ticket with apnic helpdesk for getting the authenticated response from the source itself.
Regards
Gaurav Kansal
Disclaimer:
This e-mail and its attachments may contain official Indian Government information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. The responsibility lies with the recipient to check this email and any attachment for the presence of viruses.
Hi,
Sharing the CCAOI Newsletter
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1alxHdkaMZX3FK7KBD8Y81uksqXEXT0p1/view?usp=…>
highlighting
key digital policy developments from October till date from the Indian
perspective.
Key updates in this issue are related to #cybersecurity #ransomware attacks
#antitrust #globaltaxation #Amazon investigations #metaverse #PDP Bill
#Bigtech regulation #child safety online #geopolitics #privacy
#dataprotection #InternetOutage #gigworkers #IGF2021 #inSIG2021 #IIGF2021
#YouthIGFIndia2021 and more.
Wishing you happy holidays and a prosperous 2022.
Regards,
Amrita Choudhury
CCAOI
Hi Folks
Does anybody know who I can reach out to for the following issue?
My freshly allocated prefix (*103.176.189.0/24 <http://103.176.189.0/24>) *is
unable to communicate with Reliance Jio's VoWiFi end-point on AS55836. And
hence my Jio numbers are unable to work with VoWiFi when the source IPv4
address is originating from 103.176.189.0/24.
[image: image.png]
*--*
Best Regards
Daryll J. L. Swer
Mobile Number: +91 700 592 0360
Website: daryllswer.com
<https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/130c0a88b762eb0214b0b77a47d5197bfd294fe9?ur…>
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
We are publishing these reports to network and security operations
lists in order to ensure this information reaches operational
contacts in these ASes.
This report summarises tests conducted within ind.
Inferred improvements during Nov 2021:
ASN Name Fixed-By
24560 AIRTELBROADBAND 2021-11-05
55836 RELIANCEJIO-IN 2021-11-13
Further information for the inferred remediation is available at:
https://spoofer.caida.org/remedy.php
Source Address Validation issues inferred during Nov 2021:
ASN Name First-Spoofed Last-Spoofed
24560 AIRTELBROADBAND 2016-03-12 2021-11-23
55836 RELIANCEJIO-IN 2017-03-03 2021-11-30
132976 KINGSBROADBAND 2018-09-17 2021-11-24
138731 KOVAIFN 2020-11-08 2021-11-14
139547 VIMITEL1 2021-04-10 2021-11-30
132960 MNET 2021-09-16 2021-11-01
134004 FOXTEL 2021-11-23 2021-11-23
Further information for these tests where we received spoofed
packets is available at:
https://spoofer.caida.org/recent_tests.php?country_include=ind&no_block=1
Please send any feedback or suggestions to spoofer-info(a)caida.org
Hello folks,
Anyone here running a cable tv network besides being an ISP? I recently saw
some optical to RF converter nodes hanging around in the city. Couldn't
take a picture but a quick search leads to me something like this
<https://www.amazon.in/vision-gold-Optical-Receiver-Powerless/dp/B083BVWL3W/…>.
This seems fascinating and I see videos of cable TV players on YouTube
using these optical to RF converters before their set-top box.
Wondering how these work without power (as advertised)? Is there enough
power going "outwards" in a regular cable TV set-top box to power the
photoreceivers in these adapters? In the case of DTH boxes, they send 30V
(and some minor Amps) to dish on the rooftop to power the LNB. Is the case
in the cable tv world as well? If not, how can one have electrical RF
output without any concept of reverse power?
Thanks
--
Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
