Tony and All,
While the deadline is reaching in next week, do we have any planned feedback for this draft process as APNIC?
IMO, I have one question and one concern for this proposed process.
(while not directly related with principals and mechanisms which are currently asked feedbacks)
Question: What is the difference between "vote" and "review" in next two steps? How will ICANN review it without voting?
The ICANN Board in overseeing ICANN's role as convener would: 1) ensure that the process executed adheres to the principles outlined by the community input and the NTIA principles outlined for this effort, and 2) ensure that the parameters of the scope document are upheld. Once a proposal is developed, the ICANN Board will not hold a vote on the proposal.
The steering group's final proposal for submission to NTIA will be reviewed by ICANN and the affected parties in order for each party to provide their endorsement of the proposal. That endorsement will be communicated with the proposal, but there will not be a formal voting process.
Concern: Among 5 RIRs, only APNIC doesn't have any physical meeting before ICANN 50 on Jun 22-25 where the steering group will be formed.
(ARIN had a meeting in Apr, LACNIC, RIPE, and AFRINIC will have it in May)
We need to carefully consider how we can gather community feedback from AP region without physical meeting.
Rgs,
Masato Yamanishi
Hi all
ICANN has released a draft process proposed for community discussion on
the IANA transition. A deadline of 8 May has been set for community
feedback on this process.
To view the draft process please visit:
pr14-en.htm
A short video from ICANN is also available here explaining the process and
next steps:
While ICANN has requested all feedback on the process should be submitted
discussion on this APNIC mailing list. A summary of feedback from this
list will be submitted to ICANN.
Thanks
Tony
_______________________________________________
IANAxfer mailing list