[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] (Toc 8) Second opinion requests
Hi Anne,
> Currently the information required for an additional /48 assignment to
> the same site is specified in the following request form:
>
> http://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/docs/second-opinion-request.txt
>
> It might be useful to take a look at this document.
Thanks for your suggestion. According to this request form it says;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Please explain why the customer network needs more than a /48
assignment. You must provide full details to justify multiple
/48 assignments to an end-site.
2. Please provide a network diagram that shows the IPv6 network
implementation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have editted the original draft, and added an example as follows;
------
8.1.2 Assignments
LIRs must justify why multiple /48s are needed per single end site
by the following documentation but not limited to these.
- Network diagram
- Network equipment information
- Full details to justify multiple /48 assignments to an end-site
(e.g. the number of clients (PCs or other NW equipments) or
other information which LIRs think can justify multiple /48s)
------------
Further comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Toshi
From: Anne Lord <anne@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] (Toc 8) Second opinion requests
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:38:19 +1000 (EST)
>
> Hi,
>
> Just one comment.
>
> > > | 8.1.2 Assignments
> > > | LIRs must justify why multiple /48s are needed per single end site
> > > | by the following documentation but not limited to these.
> > > |
> > > | - Network diagram
> > > | - Addressing/subnetting plan
> > > | - Network equipment information
> > >
> > > The prefix length of a subnet is always /64 in IPv6, so 'subnetting
> > > plan' is something funny. Is it not enough only below two points?
> > >
> > > - Network diagram
> > > - Network equipment information
> >
> > Oh ok. What I meant by 'subnetting plan' was something like "/64 for
> > sales department, /64 for marketing department,,,". But this may cause
> > a confusion, and this should be found on network diagram so yes I think
> > I can remove it.
> >
>
> Currently the information required for an additional /48 assignment to
> the same site is specified in the following request form:
>
> http://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/docs/second-opinion-request.txt
>
> It might be useful to take a look at this document.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Anne
> --
>
>