APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists wg-ipv6-guide 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] (ToC11) Database Registration



Thanks for the confirmation Gerard.

I suppose we don't have technical problems with any of the options
then:

> <Allocations to downstream ISPs>
>  It is ambiguous in the policy document, and these are the
>  possibilities in implementation:
> 
>  a) All allocations to downstream ISPs must be registered in RIR/NIR
>     database 
>      e.g) If a /40 allocation is made to a downtream ISP, this will be
>           registered in the database
> 
>     Pros: Appropriate contact point(dowstream ISP) available on whois
>           database even when no assignments are made under that range
>     Cons: It will not be considered in calculating utilization, so no
>           strong motivation
>           It is rare case where allocations are made to downstream
>           ISPs, but no assignments are made/when registered
>           assignments do not have updated information
> 
>  b) Allocations to downstream ISPs should not be registered in RIR/NIR
>     database
>      e.g) Even if a /40 allocation is made to a downtream ISP, it will
>           not be registered in the database
>         
>     Pros: Reduces extra work for LIRs to register downstream allocations
>    
>     Cons: No appropriate point of contact for sub-allocated range when
>           allocations are made to downstream ISP, but no assignments
>           are registered
> 
>  c) It is upto LIRs to register allocations for downtream ISPs in the
>     RIR/NIR database
>     e.g) If a /40 allocation is made to a downtream ISP, it is upto an
>          LIR whether to register this sub-allocated range
> 
>     Pros: Allows flexibility. LIRs do not need to register
>           sub-allocations if they agree to be an abuse contact on
>           behalf of its downtream ISPs
> 
>     Cons: Inconsistency in database registration
...how shall we proceed from here?

May I suggest to discuss this issue together with the authority to
register assignments for sub-allocated blocks?  I think they are
closely related issues and difficult to discuss one without the other.

> > a) Only LIRs can register assignments for downstream ISP customers
> > b) Only downstream ISP can register assignments for its customers
> > c) Case by case. Depends on how you set the maintainer


Izumi
JPNIC

From: Gerard Ross <gerard@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] (ToC11) Database Registration
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:41:47 +1000

> 
> On 22/12/2003, at 12:44 AM, (Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/藤崎 智宏) wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have one question (not to Okutani-san but to APNIC?). Is the 'IPv6
> > whois' output is same as IPv4?
> >
> 
> Hello Fujisaki-san
> 
> In this respect, the APNIC Whois database behaves the same way for both 
> IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
> 
> Regards
> - Gerard Ross
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Gerard Ross, Documentation Manager                  <gerard@apnic.net>
> APNIC                                               ph +61 7 3858 3100
> http://www.apnic.net                                fx +61 7 3858 3199
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
>