Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] RE: Wg-ipv6-guide digest, Vol 1 #10 - 1 msg

[(Tomohiro -INSTALLER-Fujisaki/$BF#:j(B $BCR9((B )<fujisaki@syce.net>]

Nakagawa-san,

Thank you very much to sumalize the discussion.

 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 9 Subsequent Allocations
 | 
 |  - An example of a typical ISP.
 | 
 |   (1) 1st subsequent allocation
 |     A typical ISP receives /32 that is 65,536 * /48s as an initial
 |     allocation.
 |     If this ISP allocates or assigns 7,132 * /48s to it's customers and
 |     its POPs, this ISP has a right of the 1st subsequent allocation.
 |     
 |     7,132 is from the HD-Ratio table ( Policy : Appendix A )
 |     
 |    Example 
 |     assignments to POPs                   326 * /48
 |     assignments to end sites            6,500 * /48
 |     assignments through downstream ISP    306 * /48
 |     ------------------------------------------------
 |     total                               7,132 * /48s 
 | 
 | 
 |   (2) 2nd subsequent allocation
 |     This ISP receives additional /32 from an adjacent address block as
 |     the second allocation.  Now, this ISP has one /31 address block.
 |     If this ISP allocates or assigns 12,417 * /48s including the
 |     previous 7,132 * /48s to it's customers and its POPs, this ISP has a
 |     right of the 2nd subsequent allocation.
 | 
 |     12,417 is from the HD-Ratio table ( Policy : Appendix A )

Do you have special intention to give only 1st and 2nd allocation
example?  If not, how about to change (2) to 'subsequent(following?) 
allocation', and describe 2nd allocation as an example?  

And I think it's better to separate 'number of /48s' and 'prefix
size' issue. At 1st allocation, an ISP gets one more /32 (this ISP has
/31 prefix),  and at 2nd subsequent allocation, the ISP gets one more
/31(/30 prefix, consequently) (is this correct?).

yours sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation