Re: [Wg-ipv6-guide] (ToC-6) Definition of a 'site'

[(Tomohiro -INSTALLER-Fujisaki/$BF#:j(B $BCR9((B )<fujisaki@syce.net>]

Hosaka-san,

 | -------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 6. Definition of a 'site'
 | 
 | A site is a [place/organization] where the single, edge network
 | exists.  A site does not mean a company nor an organization itself,
 | for a single company may have multiple locations with separate
 | networks.
 | -------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
 | This clause may help to understand 'end site' more.

I think the word a 'site' should be a 'end site' to correspond to
the policy document (this is not a serious matter).

And one question, my company has multiple separate networks at one
place.  Each network can not connect each other because each network
has different management policy.  In this case, is our network
considered as multiple sites?

 | Discussion point could be
 | 
 |  - 'A site" means 'a company', 'an organization', 'a network', 'POP',
 |     or other? (or combination of these?)
 | 
 | Please review the draft.  Any comments and feedbacks are welcome.

At the time we discussed original IPv6 address policy draft in Japan,
we deeply considered this 'site' definition, but we could not find
good one.  Then we choose 'contract based' definition (this might be
Arano-san's idea).

>From current IPv6 address policy:
> 2.9 End site
> An end site is defined as an end user (subscriber) who has a business
>   relationship with a service provider 

So, I think it better to write some examples in this section.

--
Tomohiro Fujisaki, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.