Hi Paul & all,
Great thanks for Paul's proposal. This proposal sounds reasonble for us
than the versions before.
We haved discussed with other NIRs, some of which have the same query as
we do, like NIRs, APNIC confederation members hold plenty of IP
addresses and also contain sub-members, is there any proper fee
structure that could be implemented for such confederation members?
Appreciated to have your comments on this issue.
Best regards,
Dong Yan
CNNIC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Wilson" <pwilson@apnic.net>
To: <wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: [Wg-apnic-fees] Fee proposal version 2.3
Dear all,
Please find attached a revision to the earlier fee structure proposal.
The changes from previous versions include the following:
- updated membership and allocation figures (to 1 November 2006);
- selection of an initial fee level which produces no change
in expected revenues;
- a proposed series of questions for a future membership vote.
Please note that this is a personal proposal from myself as APNIC DG.
The APNIC EC has reviewed this document and is considering the next
steps which are appropriate.
I look forward to your feedback on this important issue.
Regards,
________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson email: pwilson@apnic.net
Director General, APNIC sip: apnic@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
_______________________________________________
Wg-apnic-fees mailing list
Wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/wg-apnic-fees
_______________________________________________
Wg-apnic-fees mailing list
Wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/wg-apnic-fees
