[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Wg-apnic-fees] Compare RIRs
Hi Paul,
> As discussed in the meeting, the parameters of the structure can be
> adjusted to produce a smaller or larger surplus, or none at
> all. I agreed
> at the meeting to post a variation of the structure which
> produces no net
> surplus, and I will do that in the coming weeks.
We have been waiting a month.
I want to hear from you.
Thanks.
--
akai
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wg-apnic-fees-bounces@apnic.net
> [mailto:wg-apnic-fees-bounces@apnic.net] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:47 PM
> To: Randy Bush; wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
> Subject: Re: [Wg-apnic-fees] Compare RIRs
>
> Randy and all,
>
> I will summarise some of the points I presented during the
> members meeting
> in Taiwan. For reference, the presentation file and
> discussion documents
> are online at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/meetings/22/program/amm.html (See 2pm session)
>
> Firstly, APNIC fee levels have remained static since 1996,
> with no change
> to the small, medium and large levels (see slide 3). During
> that time, the
> effects of inflation and foreign exchange (specifically the
> low value of
> the US dollar in recent years) have reduced our real income, while
> providing a real reduction in fees for members.
>
> For the past 4 years, APNIC has budgeted for a balanced
> result with no
> surplus. During 2006 we have for the first time planned a
> small budget
> deficit, which has been expected by the APNIC Executive
> Council for some
> time (slide 4).
>
> During recent years, APNIC services have been developed extensively.
> Fortunately some of these developments have improved
> efficiency of APNIC
> operations, allowing other developments and improvements to
> be made within
> the available revenues. Some of these are listed on slide 6.
>
> My argument here is that if we are to continue to improve and extend
> services, then a budget deficit is likely to result in future
> as well. For
> this reason I have proposed an overall increase in expected
> APNIC fees of
> around 15%, in order to provide a moderate surplus and more
> flexibility to
> develop services as needed in future.
>
> As discussed in the meeting, the parameters of the structure can be
> adjusted to produce a smaller or larger surplus, or none at
> all. I agreed
> at the meeting to post a variation of the structure which
> produces no net
> surplus, and I will do that in the coming weeks.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> Paul Wilson email:
> pwilson@apnic.net
> Director General, APNIC sip:
> apnic@voip.apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net phone: +61
> 7 3858 3100
>
>
> --On Monday, 25 September 2006 4:31 PM -1000 Randy Bush
> <randy@psg.com>
> wrote:
>
> > perhaps what would be helpful at this point would be for
> apnic staff to
> > refresh us on
> > o why change is needed
> > o proposal(s) as compared to current
> > o how proposal(s) achieve goals
> >
> > this may give us some focus.
> >
> > yes, we can go to paul's kaohsiung presentation. but i hope a very
> > terse and concise version may help us be terse and concise, yet move
> > forward.
> >
> > randy
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wg-apnic-fees mailing list
> > Wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/wg-apnic-fees
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> Paul Wilson email:
> pwilson@apnic.net
> Director General, APNIC sip:
> apnic@voip.apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net phone: +61
> 7 3858 3100
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wg-apnic-fees mailing list
> Wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/wg-apnic-fees
>
