Ernest,
If I am a new member, with a newly acquired IPv4 block, why would I want to transfer it ? unless I’m a fake new member whose sole purpose is to make money on IPv4 transfer … This is what this policy is all about !
Ben then again, I can imagine that a new member could go out of business and could want to transfer a portion of his /22 … seriously ???
Everything should be free (not as in free beer), but because there will be always someone to abuse it, it has to be regulated.
Regards,
Bertrand Cherrier
Administrateur Systèmes
Micro Logic Systems
e: b.cherrier at micrologic dot nc
p: +687 24 99 24
v: 65 24 99 24
www.mls.nc
On 26 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Ernest Tse wrote:
Dear All,I fully Disagree this Proposed policy:Reason are here:(1) Why it is only prohibit on 103/8 ? Why don`t set policy to prohibit the whole transfer within APNIC members and request the unused IP bloack to return to each RIR / APNIC ?(2) There have demand for the transfer means there have a real member who need IP address, whatever it is free to get or buy in the market.(3) Lower transfer rate at other IP block means, the older members hold it but don`t use or sell or transfer to other one, it doesn`t have special mean if 103/8 have highly transfer rate.(4) Only set the prohibit limit on 103/8 mean this policy is discriminate against to the new membership, the new members don`t have to right to transfer their IP range.(5) IP address transfer is a free market, any policy to limit the transfer doesn`t have the real solution for IPv4 address exhaustion.Best Regards,
Ernest TsePacswitch Globe Telecom Ltd.// Web: http://www.pacswitch.com// Tel: +852-21570550//Mobile: +852-62536678//Skype: codesixs
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy