Re: [sig-policy] prop-106-v001: Restricting excessive IPv4 address trans
Here's the problem… If you're trying to circumvent the last /8 policy
by creating a pseudo-org, obtaining a /22, then transferring that /22
to the original org., then it's easy enough to do the transfer either
by having the parent acquire the pseudo-org (M&A) or by having the
resources transferred under Section 3.
Owen
On Feb 1, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org> wrote:
> Hi Owen,
>
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I would propose that any prefix obtained from the last /8 (these are,
> after all, easily identifiable)
>> simply be excluded from the transfer policy and that all such prefixes be
> subject to reclamation
>> if the entity which received the prefix ceases operations.
>
> Which part of the transfer policy? Section 3 deals with transfers between
> APNIC account holders while section 6 deals with corporate M&A activity.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leo