Stephan,
Thanks for your support.
So I could rewrite 4D to be something like:an address block of /48. A portable assignment of a larger block
The minimum IPv6 portable assignment to any organization is to be
can be made if it is required to make the HD-ratio for planned network assignments
from the block be below the applied HD-ratio threshold as specified
in Section 5.3.1 of the APNIC IPv6 policy,
or if addressing is required for 2 or more of the organization'ssites operating distinct and unconnected networks.Would you think that wording would be more appropriate? And would anyone else on the list also think so?
I could see your point; what would you (or anyone else on the list) think about the following wording?
4 F. An organization must only use portable assignments made under
- this policy to address its own networks and potentially the networks of affiliates
- such as majority-owned subsidiaries, joint-ventures, or, where the organization is a
- government agency, associated government departments. An organization must
not use portable assignments to address the networks or sites of
- customers or other non-affiliated organizations.
Thanks again, David