Re: [sig-policy] Summary of discussion: prop-087 - redux
On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IANA post exhaustion
>
> ps: amusing that the authors have not even had the manners to respond to direct questions on list
Please allow me to apologize to everyone for the lack of response to the questions posed on list. I was waiting for input from the other authors prior to responding on list, and was planning to discuss the topics with Izumi-san and Philip further upon my arrival in Gold Coast on Wednesday. This proved to be poor judgement on my part: early response and discussion on list would have been preferable. (This was the idea behind posting a first draft of the policy proposal for early input prior to formal submission.) Also my travel was canceled due to circumstances beyond my control. I only ask forgiveness from the community for my decisions, and I hope that my actions do not overly tarnish the merits of this global policy proposal.
There has been much effort and expense put into the crafting and presentation of this global policy proposal. It requires much more time and work than 5 times that of a single regional policy proposal in that it now has the attention of ICANN and governments around the world. It also has the attention of those organizations seeking to undermine the efforts of the IP community and the stewardship principles on which our policies are based.
I will address the questions on list immediately.
Louie
--
Louie Lee