Re: [sig-policy] prop-072: Reapplication limits whentransferringaddress space

[John Schnizlein <schnizlein@isoc.org>]

What would be the effect of a policy to refuse to record a transfer of  
which both the relinquishing and acquiring party agree?  Would it be  
good for the Internet as a whole to have this information not  
recorded?  Or do you want some organization other than the RIR for one  
of the parties to provide this kind of record?

Policies that constrain what the RIR allocates from its pool seem to  
risk fewer unintended consequences than attempting to influence the  
behavior of other parties.

John

On 2009Mar12, at 7:32 AM, <myamanis@bb.softbank.co.jp> wrote:

> My answer is "APNIC doesn't need to take any action except  
> automatically rejecting
> transfers which treating address space allocated within last 24  
> months.".
> Please remember that my proposal is just "Allocated resource within  
> 24 months is not eligible for transfer",
> and I'm NOT requesting APNIC to recognize cheating nor report it.