APNIC Home APNIC Home


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] prop-071: Justifying receiving IPv4 address space



Can I clarify section 4.3?

Is that section applicable for all time, or just until the last /8??

I would agree to the latter, not the former.

Terry

On 10/03/2009, at 7:16 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

Dear SIG members

The policy proposal 'Justifying receiving IPv4 address space' has been
sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy
SIG at APNIC 28 in Beijing, China, 24-28 August 2009. The proposal's
history can be found at:

      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-071-v001.html

We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing
list before the meeting.

The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is
an important part of the policy development process. We encourage
you to express your views on the proposal:

     - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
     - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If
       so, tell the community about your situation.
     - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
     - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
     - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
       effective?

Randy, Jian, and Ching-Heng

________________________________________________________________________

prop-071: Justifying receiving IPv4 address space
________________________________________________________________________


Author:    Philip Smith
           pfs@cisco.com

Version:   1

Date:      10 March 2009

1.  Introduction
----------------

This policy proposal seeks to supplement prop-050, "IPv4 address
transfers", by requiring recipients of transferred IPv4 address space to
justify its use.


2.  Summary of current problem
------------------------------

Prop-050, "IPv4 address transfers", as it stands at time of writing,
places no requirement on the recipient of transferred IPv4 address space
to justify their need for the additional address space before APNIC
registers the transfer.

This can allow any organisation the opportunity to stockpile IPv4
address space, to the detriment of the entire industry during the IPv4
runout period.


3.  Situation in other RIRs
---------------------------

RIPE NCC

  The transfer policy adopted by RIPE only permits transfers to take
  place if the recipient can justify the need for address space to the
RIPE NCC. Recipients of transfers cannot transfer any portion of that
  address space to another organisation within 24 months. See:

      http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html

ARIN

  The transfer policy specifically states the justification conditions
  under which transfers are permitted in the ARIN region - see section
  8.2 at:

      http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_8.html

LACNIC

  LACNIC is currently discussing a transfer proposal:

    LAC-2009-04 Transfer of IPv4 Blocks within the LACNIC Region
    http://www.lacnic.net/documentos/politicas/LAC-2009-04-propuesta-en.pdf


AfriNIC has no transfer policy.


4.  Details of the proposal
---------------------------

It is proposed that:

  4.1 Until such a time when the prevailing APNIC IPv4 allocation
      practice uses the "final /8" policy [1], the recipient of a
      transfer is to justify use of transferred space using the
      allocation and assignment policies in force at the time of the
      transfer.

  4.2 After that time, no justification is needed.

  4.3 Recipients of transferred address space are not permitted to
      transfer any portion of this address space to another
      organisation for at least 24 months.


5.  Advantages and disadvantages of the proposal
------------------------------------------------

5.1 Advantages

    - Recipients of IPv4 address transfers will have to fully justify
      receiving the address space, just as they do for any current
      direct allocations or assignments from the APNIC pool.

5.2 Disadvantages

    - None.


6.  Effect on APNIC members
---------------------------

The proposal impacts all APNIC members in that they now will have to
fully justify transfers they receive under proposal-050.


7.  Effect on NIRs
------------------

The proposal has no direct impact on NIRs, but impacts members of NIRs
in the same way it impacts APNIC members.


8.  References
--------------

[1] See section 9.10, "Policies for IPv4 address space
    management in the Asia Pacific region"
    http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy.html#9.10
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy