Re: [sig-policy] Timeline for implementing the transfer proposal

[Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>]

Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> Another question is that is this to wait to be implemented after APNIC
>>>> pool runs out, or is this something quite independent?
>>> given prop-062, when do you think the apnic pool will run out?
>> I don't know :-)
> 
> sorry, i was being cruel. :)
> 
> < chair hat == off >
> 
>> Is this policy to be implemented after the standard APNIC pool(excluding
>> prop-062 final /8 block) runs out?
>>
>> Or is it to be implemented immediately (= as in the standard PDF context)?
>>
>> what I'd like to understand is whether prop-067 intends to have timeline
>> independent from exhaustion of APNIC's address pool.
> 
> i do not believe the authors considered the question, or at least not
> deeply.  i am not sure i have a strong opinion.  but i am not sure what
> delay gains, trading is happening now, and i want the records to be kept
> well (cf your desire for knowing the history of a block).
> 
> but feel free to whack me with the clue bat.
> 

i need a bat to do that, so I'm now asking what operators in Japan think.

so James, I've read you're post and will get back to you once i hear more.


izumi