[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-policy] prop-061: 32-bit ASNs for documentation purposes
Hi all,
JPNIC + our community support this proposal.
It would be useful to define such space as in the case of other resources.
I note there has been some discussions on appropriate forum to define
the space. We don't have a strong opinion on this point.
izumi
Randy Bush wrote:
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> prop-061: 32-bit ASNs for documentation purposes
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Dear SIG members
>
> Below is a summary of discussions on the proposal to date. We
> encourage you to continue discussions on the mailing list before
> APNIC 26.
>
> Regards,
> Randy and Jian
>
>
> Discussion statistics
> ---------------------
>
> Posted to Policy SIG mailing list: 14 July 2008
>
> Number of posts: 19
>
> Number of people participating in discussions: 8
>
>
> Summary of discussions to date
> ------------------------------
>
> - There has been debate as to whether the proposal is outside the scope
> of APNIC policy and that it would be more appropriate for the IETF to
> discuss it.
>
> - A previous proposal, "prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use
> address space among LIRs", did not reach consensus within the APNIC
> community at APNIC 25 as it was considered to be more appropriate
> for the IETF to discuss.
>
> - However, an earlier proposal, "IPv6 for for documentation purposes"
> was adopted by APNIC in 2002 and was later adopted as an RFC.
>
> Full details of the proposal, including links to previous discussions
> of it at earlier APNIC meetings, can be found at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-061-v001.html
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
