Re: [sig-policy] prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use address space among LIRs

[Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>]

Randy Bush said the following on 12/2/08 12:50:
> Continuing discussion
> ---------------------
>
> Here are some questions to help discussion continue:
>
>      - Do you support or oppose this proposal?

Strongly oppose.

It is a complete waste of time and energy. We already have RFC1918 
space, the proposal to expand that was thrown out, and we already have a 
suggestion to use 240/4 for private space. Do we need yet another??

How many more ways to people want to run out of IPv4? ;-)

It's going to run out, we need to realise that, and figure out what 
comes next.

philip
--

>      - Can this proposal be implemented along with other proposals
>        at APNIC or does its implementation mean that other proposals
>        cannot be implemented?
>
>      - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
>        tell the community about your situation.
>
>      - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>
>      - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>
>      - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>        effective?
>
>
> Full details of the proposal can be found at:
>
>      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-058-v001.html
>
> randy, for the policy sig {chair}
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy