Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria

[Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>]

Hi Tim,


I don't really have an answer to that. As AfriNIC has already
implemented the criteria about routing annoucements, they can perhaps
confirm with AfriNIC hosmasters?


Izumi

Tim Jones wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
> 
> In practical terms, how would APNIC hostmasters evaluate this? How exactly does an LIR "demonstrate"?
> 
> I think that this is more ambiguous than the "plan to make 200 assignments" wording you are trying to remove from the policy.
> 
> What happens if the LIR is not announcing the address space in two years?
> 
> Tim.
> 
> 
> On 7/2/08 5:34 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Hi Philip,
> 
> 
> Thanks for explaining. I agree to remove the word "plan" if that's what
> the common definition is.
> 
> I still feel "must announce" is quite a strong statement though.
> 
> I think the level of commitment required should be consistent with
> other resources, so how about adding the word "demonstrate"?
> 
> It's used in defining criteria for all APNIC resources, i.e, IPv4
> allocation, small mult-home assigment and ASN (see below) and hope this
> would address your concern.
> 
> The proposed phrase would be:
> 
> -----
>  The LIR must also demonstrate to announce the allocation as a single
>  aggregated block in the inter-domain routing system within two years.
> -----
> 
> 
> izumi
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IPv4 allocation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  :
>  :
> *demonstrate* a detailed plan for use of a /22 within a year; and
>  :
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> small multi-homed assignment
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  :
> is currently multihomed with provider-based addresses, or *demonstrates*
> a plan to multihome within one month; and
> agrees to renumber out of previously assigned address space.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ASN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if it:
>  :
>  :
> An organisation will also be eligible if it can *demonstrate* that it
> will meet the above criteria upon receiving an ASN (or within a
> reasonably short time thereafter).
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy